Are
we still relying to gold as positive support for currencies?
By
now everybody, every country, knows that we are no longer using gold
as a standard to support our sovereign cash. It was dropped as
support for the US DOLLAR by Richard Nixon in 1971. This is also the date
the USA treasury introduced FIAT money. FIAT money is essentially a
form of intangible currency which is not backed by gold but rather by
a guarantee of the government issuing it.
From
my own research the gold mineral did increase to 1,600+ US Dollar per
ounce, for a short period in 2012 and then floated close to where it
is now, around US Dollar 1,450/ounce.
Later
in the blog I will come back to the term "Inflation", but
for now I can say I have done all calculations since 1960 to 2016, to
provide feedback of the income related to gold holdings. Gold has
been a steady income source over eighty years, performing at par with
the inflation rates, given by the FED, for the same period.
Gold
has been in demand ever since the 1970's but it is held captive by
those who control the market. They, whoever they are, do not allow
for much speculation, so it is not a profit related market, tightly
controlled and not subject to bulls and bears. It is so tightly
regulated that governments of this day and age, who are buying
truckloads of the commodity, which should be influencing the price
upward, find a price unscathed by demand.
Since
I was active on the international market, with a German company, to
invest in gold mining operations all over the world, I had to conduct
research pertaining to set-up of a mine, through the start-up line,
to sales.
It
emerged from my research, that there are only three refineries in
Africa. No gold are supposedly allowed to be sold on international
markets without being cast in specific weights and numbered by a
refinery. On the one hand, that is good, because it contains crime in speculation and
substitution. On the other hand, it restricts trade on an
informal basis, which would give a better support for market
requirements. It will/does elicit a lot more undocumented production for the black market and
therefore, no or little tax on production, which could surpass
professional and regulated mining.
In
my refined search for investors I found many, who would do anything
for a good deal in mining, until they understood, that setting up
plant and machinery for a mine, is a hefty sum, which does not
include a guarantee of a huge pocket of gold reserve. On the other
hand, informal mining is also not genuinely lucrative because it is
normally inconclusive and an accidental find, which could claim the
life of the single miner, even before any gold is found/sold.
Informal mining is extremely dangerous, never-the-less it takes place
on a huge scale. Although illegal, most of these African refineries,
which belongs to a range of secretive companies, must be buying black
market gold for a penny a dollar, under the pretext that they are not
able or allowed to. It is the way scrap dealers operate on a global
scale. I have operators who dealt with them and know this for fact.
We do not have to test it for resonance, it happens. Who gains from
this? Obviously the owners of the mine and refinery, who are normally
the shareholders of some or other conglomerate. In my story line,
this does not impact on the result, but I expect you to remember this
when I add mix in the jug of economics.
We
are
always informed that gold has no bearing on our present currencies
and is not considered a support for it. It is emerging now that this
news are being cast aside by some of the more
prominent Economies and that gold is definitely considered as a
support for national
currencies.
As example we heard the news this week, that Deutsche Bank has
confiscated twenty tons of gold, owned
by Venezuela. This gold is redeemed, whether used as an excuse for seizure or a genuine tenure for unpaid loans, which were given
in the last three years. If gold was becoming irrelevant, DM would
stake no value to it.
We are always informed that gold has no bearing on our present currencies and is not considered a support for it. It is emerging now that this news are being cast aside by some of the more prominent Economies and that gold is definitely considered as a support for national currencies. As example we heard the news this week, that Deutsche Bank has confiscated twenty tons of gold, owned by Venezuela. This gold is redeemed, whether used as an excuse for seizure or a genuine tenure for unpaid loans, which were given in the last three years. If gold was becoming irrelevant, DM would stake no value to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment